<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Iron Man 2 Already Earns $100 Million Worldwide Before Even Opening In America</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.movieviral.com/2010/05/02/iron-man-2-already-earns-100-million-worldwide-before-even-opening-in-america/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.movieviral.com/2010/05/02/iron-man-2-already-earns-100-million-worldwide-before-even-opening-in-america/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 08:02:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: VanGoghX</title>
		<link>http://www.movieviral.com/2010/05/02/iron-man-2-already-earns-100-million-worldwide-before-even-opening-in-america/comment-page-1/#comment-9511</link>
		<dc:creator>VanGoghX</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 May 2010 08:33:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.movieviral.com/?p=11926#comment-9511</guid>
		<description>3D this, 3D that. I think Marvel&#039;s smart to stay away from 3D. I&#039;ve yet to be thoroughly convinced that 3D should be mandatory for action movies. Avatar is like taking a fun ride in 3D, but it also illustrates the downfall of the technology. 3D is cumbersome for the viewer for extended stretches of time. It&#039;s a nifty idea and fun to experience, but do we really want to live there?
I&#039;m not saying 3D completely sucks, it has it&#039;s place. CG toons can be fun, but they&#039;re often just as effective in 2D.
My sole hold-out on 3D technology, the one I&#039;m looking forward to seeing in 3D is &#039;Tron: Legacy&#039;.
But I think it&#039;s a mistake to determine an action movies fate based upon its inclusion of a technology that does little to enhance its quality, and can actually be detrimental to the overall enjoyment of the story.

But then I&#039;m tired and kinda jabbering out my arse. ;-) What were we talking about again? Oh, Iron Man 2. I&#039;m gonna see it opening day and expect box office numbers will help insure we get our Avengers movie in two years.

I hope &#039;Thor&#039; and &#039;Capt. America&#039; retain the level of quality that Marvel has been able to attain so far. (With the exception of the second &#039;Hulk&#039; movie, which I found to be mediocre.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>3D this, 3D that. I think Marvel&#8217;s smart to stay away from 3D. I&#8217;ve yet to be thoroughly convinced that 3D should be mandatory for action movies. Avatar is like taking a fun ride in 3D, but it also illustrates the downfall of the technology. 3D is cumbersome for the viewer for extended stretches of time. It&#8217;s a nifty idea and fun to experience, but do we really want to live there?<br />
I&#8217;m not saying 3D completely sucks, it has it&#8217;s place. CG toons can be fun, but they&#8217;re often just as effective in 2D.<br />
My sole hold-out on 3D technology, the one I&#8217;m looking forward to seeing in 3D is &#8216;Tron: Legacy&#8217;.<br />
But I think it&#8217;s a mistake to determine an action movies fate based upon its inclusion of a technology that does little to enhance its quality, and can actually be detrimental to the overall enjoyment of the story.</p>
<p>But then I&#8217;m tired and kinda jabbering out my arse. <img src='http://www.movieviral.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' />  What were we talking about again? Oh, Iron Man 2. I&#8217;m gonna see it opening day and expect box office numbers will help insure we get our Avengers movie in two years.</p>
<p>I hope &#8216;Thor&#8217; and &#8216;Capt. America&#8217; retain the level of quality that Marvel has been able to attain so far. (With the exception of the second &#8216;Hulk&#8217; movie, which I found to be mediocre.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://www.movieviral.com/2010/05/02/iron-man-2-already-earns-100-million-worldwide-before-even-opening-in-america/comment-page-1/#comment-9484</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 May 2010 00:44:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.movieviral.com/?p=11926#comment-9484</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think the film will break records (in part because there is no 3D), but I do think it&#039;s opening weekend in North America will easily exceed the original.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think the film will break records (in part because there is no 3D), but I do think it&#8217;s opening weekend in North America will easily exceed the original.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

